Leaving Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram

For a while, I’ve been on a downer about Facebook. I should help give some content to better understand this perspective. I worked on preparation for GDPR – the General DataProtection Regulation that was instituted in Europe and came into effect on 25 May 2018.

Image obtained from Medium.com

It’s a great set of rules that define how organisations should respect and allow individuals to manage their own data. Yes, they might have collected it, but it is about us, it is thus still ours. It’s worth reading regardless of where you live, it might not be an issue as an individual, but most of us work for organisations and they have to abide by its rules. Indeed GDPR is not the only legislation about privacy and a surprising number of countries or sovereign states have controls.

Now, many will know of the Cambridge Analytica scandal that was linked to Facebook, indeed, it could not have happened unless Facebook had been so carefree with our data.

There have been other issues raised, such as Facebook’s influence over the 2016 voting for the US presidency and the UK’s Brexit vote. Recent changes by Facebook are, in my view, recognition that if it doesn’t change some aspects of its operations, it will be forced to by US or other governments.

Since those days, more and more focus has been directed to Facebook and how it handles our data. Instagram started in 2010 and was swiftly purchased by Facebook in 2012. WhatsApp started a little earlier than Instagram in 2009 and was bought by Facebook n 2014.

The links between the three products have become steadily more fixed and allow flow of data between them, although Instagram has maintained a distinct identity longer than expected. Now, however, Facebook has solidified that the three platforms are very much intertwined.

Why is this an issue? Think about it, you might text a friend in WhatsApp, like their photo in Instagram and then share common events and other thoughts in Facebook. That means Facebook now has the most complete understanding of you, as an individual, your network and it’s connections, as it possibly could. Indeed, it probably knows more about you than the government. Facebook knows who you are, who you like – and based on those social connections, who you don’t.

The recent announcement or clarification of the relationship between WhatsApp and Facebook for me was the end. I’m posting this today and linking to Instagram so that I can close my accounts on all three services fully. (Yes, I’ve deactivated my main profile on Facebook, but maintained Messenger contact with some of my best friends). I’ve moved to MeWe as my general social network platform (friends know I’ve tried various other social networks in the past, but this one feels like it could last). I’ve also moved to Signal which is amazingly like WhatsApp so it’s an easy switch for many to make. I’ve seen the numbers of others switching to Signal increase significantly in the last two weeks since I joined.

Many know I like Apple products. I like Apple because I trust that, while not perfect, it will allow me to manage my privacy more effectively and allow me to be the individual I want to be. The feud between Facebook and Apple only further highlights just how much Facebook wants, no I should rephrase, needs to know about you and your network of friends and other contacts.

Apple recently announced its intention to bring to the small screen the Isaac Asimov series about Foundation. The basis of which is “psychohistory” or the ability to predict mass groups and what they will do. To me Facebook is already attempting to bring this to life. Want to get a sense of how that could go wrong? Try another science fiction film – Minority Report. I don’t seriously think we’ll allow that sort of “Precrime” concept, though given the last four years (2016-2020) and the weird political actions that have happened, perhaps I should be more concerned?

Facebook is disturbingly easy to use and stay in touch with some friends, but it has a very dirty past in my opinion and now is a great time to highlight to them by switching off my connection with them.

For those who wonder why I left Facebook

Apple have started to push developers to provide “health labels” for their applications. There are many concerns around this, including whether Apple will document their applications as transparently.

However, the first updates about some messaging applications have shown up some very stark differences about who collects what information.

A link to the 9to5Mac article explaining the labels

The smallest label is for Signal – which effectively stores nothing! This is why many groups who want or need privacy are using Signal to handle communications.

The largest, by contrast and by a VERY LONG way is Facebook Messenger. In effect, it would seem to collect any and all data that it can. WhatsApp, owned by Facebook, is a much smaller list, so would suggest that Facebook Messenger doesn’t need that huge amount of data. Given the history of Facebook with Cambridge Analytica, the collection of so much data doesn’t paint the picture of an organisation concerned with data privacy. Remember the more information that is collected the more it could leak or be used for purposes other than those we would like.

This is why GDPR asked data collectors to focus on why they collect data and to only collect the minimum they require.

For Facebook to need so much data suggests what we all really know, which is that they are wanting to know as much as they can about any and all of us.

I’m an avid science-fiction fan and adore Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series. These are based on the concept of psychohistory, which attempts to determine what humankind will do using a theory – psychohistory – to predict what mass groups will do in the future.

What I see is Facebook trying to emulate that concept. What is a challenge is that psychohistory was a fictional construct. I’m not sure Facebook got the memo that it is fictional and believe they can predict what the masses will do – or worse – that they can use the materials they have gathered to influence. Now that latter aspect is what has many concerned about the long term aims of Facebook, and is what drives me to minimise what I do and how I interact with anything to do with Facebook.

I have no doubt our personal data is needed for some companies to deliver what they do, Facebook doesn’t need mine.

Nor do I trust Facebook to do the right thing with my data if they have it.