For those who wonder why I left Facebook

Apple have started to push developers to provide “health labels” for their applications. There are many concerns around this, including whether Apple will document their applications as transparently.

However, the first updates about some messaging applications have shown up some very stark differences about who collects what information.

A link to the 9to5Mac article explaining the labels

The smallest label is for Signal – which effectively stores nothing! This is why many groups who want or need privacy are using Signal to handle communications.

The largest, by contrast and by a VERY LONG way is Facebook Messenger. In effect, it would seem to collect any and all data that it can. WhatsApp, owned by Facebook, is a much smaller list, so would suggest that Facebook Messenger doesn’t need that huge amount of data. Given the history of Facebook with Cambridge Analytica, the collection of so much data doesn’t paint the picture of an organisation concerned with data privacy. Remember the more information that is collected the more it could leak or be used for purposes other than those we would like.

This is why GDPR asked data collectors to focus on why they collect data and to only collect the minimum they require.

For Facebook to need so much data suggests what we all really know, which is that they are wanting to know as much as they can about any and all of us.

I’m an avid science-fiction fan and adore Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series. These are based on the concept of psychohistory, which attempts to determine what humankind will do using a theory – psychohistory – to predict what mass groups will do in the future.

What I see is Facebook trying to emulate that concept. What is a challenge is that psychohistory was a fictional construct. I’m not sure Facebook got the memo that it is fictional and believe they can predict what the masses will do – or worse – that they can use the materials they have gathered to influence. Now that latter aspect is what has many concerned about the long term aims of Facebook, and is what drives me to minimise what I do and how I interact with anything to do with Facebook.

I have no doubt our personal data is needed for some companies to deliver what they do, Facebook doesn’t need mine.

Nor do I trust Facebook to do the right thing with my data if they have it.

Facebook is too big

I left Facebook more for fears of how they failed to address privacy than other reasons, though those other factors for which Facebook constantly faces criticism did play a part.

To know that a report which it instigated reinforces that some of the issues society today faces are driven by how Facebook works, only makes me more focused on staying out of its way.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53333626

This article by the BBC highlights that far from being a saint, Facebook is a sinner of the worst kind. That, as at that time, 990 or more companies are boycotting Facebook advertising because of how it operates, only corroborates that perspective.

Facebook is great for maintaining contact with friends, but there are other ways.

I’d love to find a way to help and connect with others that is about cooperation, not segregation. About consideration for others, not self-aggrandisement. For the whole of society, not individuals or elitist groups – regardless of political affiliation.

A win for personal privacy

The UK Government had insisted they have the right model, despite security researchers finding lots of flaws and being advised it could breach privacy legislation. Though with the latter, the UK Government’s steam-roller like focus on “getting Brexit done” might leave us, it’s citizens, more exposed anyway.

So, today I read, they’ve made another u-turn and will use the more privacy-focused Apple/Google solution. Good for all of us.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53095336

Contact tracing must be safe

Yes, contact tracing is an important step for some countries to better manage the impact of coronavirus. However, sacrificing personal privacy at the risk of it bing shared to untrustworthy operators isn’t.

This article highlights the research performed on the source code the UK government share of its contact tracing app.

Both coronavirus and personal privacy are important, neither, regardless of perspective should outweigh the other.

NHSX, fix the app or it won’t be used by the privacy conscious.

Why won’t the UK save more lives?

This article by Ben Lovejoy highlights the bad judgement employed by the UK NHS in choosing to create its own contact tracing app for monitoring CoVid-19.

Sometimes big business makes really great decisions on behalf of the community it services. Not all decisions are about making money.

The UK approach will not be accepted by all. Certainly not by me for all my usual privacy reasons.

I still don’t fully trust Google, but if they’re working in conjunction with Apple, I am happier that they are both working in our best interests.

The UK government has, like others, made some “interesting” decisions during the pandemic. This one feels like it has been politically motivated.

I will use any app that uses the Apple/Google API. That means I won’t use the NHS one.

#letstalksafetech

I work for IBM, I should say that up front in case of any concerns that I don’t make that clear.

IBM has launched a micro-site on our IBM Volunteer Portal which has Mayim Bialik, yes Amy Farrah Fowler heself from The Big Bang Theory, sharing tips about being safe online for the younger people around the world.

Let’s start with the link: https://www.ibm.org/activities/cybersecurity/safetech

Indeed, this is information that is valuable to anyone who is online – which is pretty much the whole world these days.

Be safe, be secure, and do the right things for yourself.

I’m glad I’m not the only one…

Privacy, and security, are important. Unfortunately the vast majority of people seem oblivious and continue to use Facebook, Google and other tools which, to all intents and purposes, work hard to ignore your privacy.

I found this article refreshing reading, to know others care and have at least started to explain to others the alternatives which can maintain their privacy.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50460712

Don’t be someone who falls foul of the next Cambridge Analytica.

Facebook misusing the iPhone camera?

So, Facebook is again in the forefront of a privacy issue, this time for using the camera whilst the user is using Facebook. It is a limited issue, so it may be accidental.

However, the fact that it has happened, is Facebook and could be misused, is a problem.

Be safe, make sure your settings are relevant to your use and remember to be wary of any organisation that fails to be completely transparent about their privacy policy and stance.

https://appleinsider.com/articles/19/11/12/facebook-app-accesses-iphone-camera-without-users-knowledge

Cambridge Analytica v2?

I’m fascinated by technology and love how it enables us. I’m equally fascinated by privacy and how technology is impacting how we’re manipulated.

Should you be worried?

Well, listen to this 21 minute podcast and see why you should be.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p07rfjj9

If you don’t start getting worried or feeling that your fears are now well founded, you’re either Steve Bannon or Dominic Cummings.

A brilliant – and free – solution to ransomware

It’s great to see innovative thinking in any situation, but especially where individuals who may lack technical knowledge are faced with a criminal issue.

Like ransomware.

You may click on an unexpected email, never a good thing, but we all make errors at times. Hey presto, your mail, photos, files, perhaps even your whole PC are locked – their contents encrypted unless you pay a ransom.

So this site is a great idea:

https://www.nomoreransom.org/

It’s easy to use and follow the steps. It’s linked to police organisations.

It’s the ideal solution.

It can’t do every type of ransomware, but it does a lot – and probably the most common.

Be safe.